Is $COIN in trouble?
With Voyager Digital $VYGVF filing for bankruptcy today, is Coinbase $COIN at risk? Coinbase has seen declining growth and margins over the past few quarters. If this continues could it face a similar risk?

Here is a look at Coinbase's recent performance.
post media
Hedge Vision's avatar
$115.9m follower assets
Voyager Files For Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
$VYGVF Voyager has officially filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, although it plans on staying in business for the time being.

​Planned Debt Reorganization Plan:
“Under this Plan, which is subject to change given ongoing discussions with other parties, and requires Court approval, customers with crypto in their account(s) will receive in exchange a combination of the crypto in their account(s), proceeds from the 3AC recovery, common shares in the newly reorganized Company, and Voyager tokens. The plan contemplates an opportunity for customers to elect the proportion of common equity and crypto they will receive, subject to certain maximum thresholds.”

“Customers with USD deposits in their account(s) will receive access to those funds after a reconciliation and fraud prevention process is completed with Metropolitan Commercial Bank.”

Also was not aware that Google invested in them, although only $955K.




post mediapost media
Hedge Vision's avatar
$115.9m follower assets
Is USD Actually FDIC-Insured on Voyager?
$VYGVF up about 10% today after plunging lower by over 50% yesterday.
The company disclosed it had more than $660 million exposed to Three Arrows Capital; Voyager has not been paid back yet. The company may issue a notice of default to the crypto hedge fund.
USD from Voyager hit my bank account today so I can breathe a sigh of relief 😅
There is also controversy that USD on Voyager is not actually FDIC-insured. See the picture below:

Big question is whether Voyager loaning money to 3AC qualifies as “malfeasance.” It also appears that USD may not be insured if Voyager fails, according to the first highlighted sentence. Any thoughts?
Meanwhile, Voyager quietly lowered one-day withdrawal limits to $10,000 without notifying customers 🤔
post media
Zack Morris's avatar
$13.3m follower assets
Part 2: Replacing Stock with Options + Cash
I've posted a follow-up article to my last post.

In this article:
  • "Synthetic long" options spreads: using a long call option and short put option spread to replicate the return on the underlying for a fraction of the up-front capital.
  • How to utilize synthetic longs to generate a free margin loan from your portfolio.
  • An idea for where to park all that excess cash.

Zack Morris's avatar
$13.3m follower assets
1 of 5
Replacing equity exposure with options + USDC on Voyager
The investment strategy laid out in this post utilizes USD Coin (USDC), a cryptocurrency known as a stablecoin and pegged to the US dollar, and Voyager, an app-based digital asset trading and financial services platform.
USDC is issued by Circle, a US-based company which is currently expected to go public in the US via SPAC combination with Concord Acquisition Corp (NYSE: CND). USDC is fully backed by USD and treasuries and is seen as the most stable, reliable and resilient stablecoin in the market, but is potentially subject to unknown risks stemming from the crypto economy and/or regulators. For example, in a worst-case scenario, one might conceive of regulators freezing and/or confiscating crypto assets, including USDC.
Voyager (TSE: VOYG | US OTC: $VYGVF**) is a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange and US OTC. If you’re unfamiliar with different crypto platforms, you can think of it like Coinbase.**
USD deposits on Voyager are FDIC insured. However, USDC and other digital asset holdings are not FDIC insured, and in the event that Voyager were to go bankrupt, depositors of digital assets might lose some or all of their deposits.
Read more about Voyager and USDC here and here.
I highlight these risks upfront because other stablecoins, most recently Terra (UST), which was an algorithmic stablecoin not fully backed by USD, have lost their peg and gone to effectively zero. USDC’s primary competitor and the stablecoin with the largest market share currently, Tether (USDT), is another “fully backed” stablecoin but there have been doubts about the nature and quality of the assets backing USDT.
While Voyager doesn’t support algorithmic stablecoins, they do support USDT. If USDT were to lose its peg, it’s not clear to me what the ramifications would be Voyager as a company. As such, I consider the risks to include bankruptcy and potential customer forfeiture of some or all of their digital assets on the platform.
I consider these tail risks, perhaps of the nature inherent to almost any investment. As such, I do not recommend putting 100% of your capital in this trade, even though I will refer to aspects of the trade below as risk-free for simplicity of communication. Owning USDC is not risk-free in the sense that owning USD is risk-free, and some (but surely not all!) of the risks specific to USDC have been covered above.*
NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE!!!
Now, on to the fun part :)
If you’re like me, in between pondering if you’re just completely wrong about everything recently you might have been pondering how to take advantage of Voyager’s high interest rates on USDC without reducing your exposure to stocks or crypto after a 60% drawdown.
Currently, you can get paid interest on USDC held on Voyager according to the following tiers:

Just straight selling everything and investing $100k at a risk-free* blended 7.69% is not a bad option. In fact, it’s a really, really good option. The long-run average annual return for the S&P 500 is ~8%.
In hindsight, this would have been a great option in, say, November 2021. But punching out of the stock market now after the S&P 500 just suffered its worst start to the year through April since World War II might not be best time to find religion with respect to your investments (or maybe it is!).
But what if I told you you could have your cake and eat it too? Retain all of your equity exposure and protect your capital in the event we are in a multi-year bear market and stocks still have much lower to go?
The Trade
Imagine you own 100 shares of SPY at today’s closing price of $412.93 for a total investment of $41,293. By using long-dated call options and utilizing Voyager’s interest rates on USDC you can retain 100% of the upside of owning 100 shares of SPY and limit your downside to +4% over the next 2.5 years.
Yep, that’s right. Your risk " is +4%.
If the S&P 500 falls by 50%, you make 4%.
If the S&P 500 gains 50%, you make 54%.
All of the reward and none of the risk.
Here’s how (prices reflect 5/31/2022 last traded prices):
  • SELL: 100 shares SPY @ $412.93 for $41,293
  • BUY: 1 $410 (at-the-money) strike SPY call option expiring 12/20/2024 for $6,380
  • BUY: $34,913 USDC on Voyager
By replacing your stock portfolio with options, you limit your losses to the premium paid, in this case $6,380.
Of course, typically the trade-off for limiting your downside by using call options is a commensurate reduction of your upside. It’s like buying insurance. It only pays off if shit hits the fan.
A typical call option payoff profile looks like this:

The y-axis is the portfolio % return. The x-axis is the % return of the underlying equity.
The blue curve represents the % return of the option + cash portfolio. It’s losses are capped at -15.5% (the flat left half of the blue curve), which represents the premium paid to acquire the option ($6,380 loss). No matter how low the underlying equity goes, you can only lose what you paid for the option. But on the upside the option + cash portfolio underperforms by the cost of the option (illustrated by the blue curve being below the orange line for all positive returns of the underlying equity).
The orange line represents the % return of the all stock portfolio. The orange line is just y = x.
Here’s the same payoff profile using portfolio $ value for the y-axis instead of % returns. Remember our starting portfolio is $41,293, indicated by the intersect of the orange line at 0% return.

Options are a capital efficient way to get exposure to financial asset prices. Said differently, they have embedded leverage.
In the trade above, you gain exposure to $41,293 worth of SPY but only have to put up $6,380 to do it. Now you’ve got SPY exposure and $34,913 in cash laying around.
The payoff profiles above assume you don’t earn any return on that cash. For the better part of the last 15 years, that has been an accurate assumption and thus this trade hasn’t been as exciting. The unique opportunity we are presented today arises from the fact that we can invest a stable, dollar-pegged, risk-free asset in USDC at advantageous interest rates of up to 9%.
Let’s look at these payoff profiles again, this time assuming we invest the $34,913 in USDC on Voyager at the tiers offered above.


Notice that the blue “options+cash” curve is now permanently above the orange “stock” line. The rates we can get on USDC are so good that we can more than recoup the premium paid for the call option in interest paid on USDC over our holding period, which is determined by the expiration date on our option, 12/20/2024 (2.56 years from now).
The blended interest rate on $34,913 invested in USDC on Voyager is 8.5%. $34,913 compounded at 8.5% for 2.56 years = $43,026 for a $8,113 gain on investment.
This $8,113 gain more than pays for the $6,380 premium on our option!
Thus, by replacing our 100 shares of SPY with a 12/20/2024 $410 strike call option and cash invested in USDC on Voyager, we can create a portfolio with more return for less risk.
We effectively get paid to take on an insurance policy. We lock-in a minimum 4% portfolio level gain over the 2.56 year holding period while retaining all of the upside if the market takes off.
Reward: check. Risk: none*.
Absent tax consequences or an inability or aversion to holding options and/or USDC on Voyager (fair!), or a view that the interest rates on USDC are going to imminently collapse (also fair!), there’s not a good reason in my mind to continue holding SPY exposure when implied volatility is this low in this environment and you can earn 9% on cash.
The Other Trade
Let’s say you actually have a view stocks have bottomed and expect decent returns from here over the next couple years. You’re willing to take on a little downside risk for some more upside exposure.
By purchasing two options contracts instead of one, you can juice your returns and get a more convex payoff curve.
  • SELL: 100 shares SPY @ $412.93 for $41,293
  • BUY: 2 $410 (ATM) strike SPY call options expiring 12/20/2024 for $12,760
  • BUY: $28,533 USDC on Voyager


Now you’re risk is truncated at -14% since you’re spending twice as much on premium and have less cash left over to invest in USDC.
Notice now we also have some area where the blue payoff curve is below the orange payoff line of simply owning equity. If SPY returns all in a range of -14% to 12% from now until 12/20/2024, we will have performed worse than if we had just continued to hold SPY.
But notice also how we start to outperform more and more for higher returns of the underlying SPY. If SPY gains 50% from here, this portfolio returns a whopping 87%, as opposed to the 54% in our risk-free* portfolio construction above. With a 50% gain in SPY during our holding period, this portfolio grows to a nominal $77,265 vs. the prior portfolio’s $63,955. This turbocharged portfolio has better returns for all returns of the underlying SPY 18% or greater.
What we have created is functionally a way to maximize returns on the view that the stock market is going to rebound strongly from current levels over the next 2.5 years, while keeping a parachute in our back pocket in case we’re totally wrong. In a sideways market, we end up leaking capital.
A Few Considerations…
  1. Your actual returns won’t precisely match the payoff curves above due to other factors that influence the price of your option, namely time to expiry and volatility. But if you hold all the way to expiry (when time value and volatility = 0) your payoff curve will match the graphs above.
  1. Why the 12/20/2024 expiration date? It’s simply the longest-dated option available currently. We want to utilize the longest-dated option available to us because the time-value decay on the option will be the slowest. If you do this trade, you’ll want to keep an eye on the options chain and probably roll your exposure into the longer dated expirations as they are listed, absent any tax consequences or an updated view (e.g. more bullish or bearish).
  1. This trade only works as advertised if Voyager continues to offer the same interest rates on USDC for the duration of the trade. If the rates adjust down (or up!), the model inputs need to change and the trade reconsidered. Here is a google sheet with the model that produces the payoff curves above. The inputs, including interest rates on USDC, are in blue. Change the static blue inputs and the payoff curves should adjust dynamically.
  1. Taxes! Before you run out and sell all your equity exposure to buy options, consider taxes. If you sell equity you might have a taxable event (if you have a gain). If you have a loss, replacing exposure with options may be considered a wash sale. If it is a wash sale, your cost basis on your new position is adjusted upwards by the amount of the loss (i.e. you don’t lose your capital loss in a wash sale, you just don’t incur it yet - it remains unrealized).
  1. One disadvantage of holding options instead of equity is you have a forced taxable event when the option expires. Simply holding SPY, in the example above, might be more tax efficient depending on your tax status.
  1. You can do this with any stock or ETF that has listed options! I just used SPY for illustrative purposes. One caveat though - options cover 100 share lots of the underlying, so you need to have at least ~100 shares of the underlying in order to accurately replace your exposure with options. If you have 200 shares of the underlying, you buy two options contracts to match the exposure; 300, three, etc. As such, replicating this trade is probably only feasible for most retail investors with either large index positions or positions in individual stocks with lower nominal stock prices. Not too many people can afford 100+ shares of AMZN or GOOG (pre-split).
  1. This trade is most attractive on a relative basis for equities that have low volatility, since options premiums on low-vol stocks are lower.
  1. For example (considering points 6 and 7) I’m executing this style of trade in my portfolio right now on DBX, ANGI, ATUS, and KRBN. I modeled it for ARKG and SNAP, but the implied volatility on these equities is so high that the option premium costs more than the potential gain on investment in USDC, making this a less attractive trade for continued ARKG or SNAP exposure.
  1. If you like this trade in theory but don’t want to fux with anything on crypto rails right now, Series I Savings Bonds are currently yielding 9.62%. It’s a 30 year bond redeemable with no penalty after 5 years and with a 3-month interest penalty after 1 year. The rate is linked to CPI inflation and resets every 6 months. The maximum investment is $10,000 per individual per year.
Thanks to Harley Bassman (@convexitymaven on Twitter) for the idea that inspired this trade. Here’s a link to his piece from November 2021 where he explains what I try to explain above, but way better. If I only I’d have listened to him then…
Disclosure: I own USDC, DBX+calls, ANGI+calls, ATUS+calls, KRBN+calls and ARKG
post mediapost media
This is awesome, thanks for sharing all this! Loved the point about how "options are a capital efficient way to get exposure to financial asset prices.--> They have embedded leverage."

Question though, why is Voyager offering such a high rate on USDC? Isn't that a little suspect since you can't get that high of a rate on USDC elsewhere? Sticks out to me as unsustainable 👀

But love the idea and how you laid it out, especially all the considerations you added.
View 3 more comments
Sachiv's avatar
$772.8k follower assets
Small buys the last 3 days
Small adds to $DDOG $AMD $ABNB
Sold puts on $DDOG ($90 strike July 2022) - continued bet on b2b cloud data service providers doing well vs just those providing tools for e-commerce (eg like $SNOW $MDB vs $TWLO and $SHOP) Yes, growth rates will taper in 2023, but leverage should be clear to see for investors to finally move to p/e and earnings yields. The million $ question- which ones retain moats and can defend earnings over the long run,like $MSFT & $GOOG ?

Based on results and guidance I believe $NVDA and $AMD will continue to dominate, and b2b software(as I mentioned above) will continue its penetration and expansion into larger SMEs and enterprises.

$ABNB is an example of a pandemic beneficiary but it first had to go through the downturn and be led by amazing management! Let’s see how these latest moves and new “product” launches do this summer and beyond!

Missed out on puts and adding to $TSLA by a tiny tiny diff on my limit orders. The Shanghai factory expansion announcement and reopening of the region have helped boost the short term price, but we will soon see upward revisions for late 2023 and beyond by Gary Black and the other Tesla bulls.

Sold out on crypto exchange $VYGVF after losing 80%…numbers seem good, margins ok, but no moat in the long run. Maybe I just don’t understand crypto yet…it was too small a part of my portfolio and didn’t fall into an area I understand or an area I am spending time trying to understand.
Modern Growth Investing Portfolio 12/01/2021
Sharing My portfolio for December 2021(Top 30 Positions - 87.39% of my overall portfolio - Ask Me Anything!)

Business I Own - Percentage
$TTD 8.23
$NOW 5.65
$APP 5.41
$HIMS 4.83
$BRLT 4.58
$AFRM 4.58
$CRM 4.35
$IS 4.22
$ROVR 3.89
$BLND 3.30
$CTSDF 3.00
$ACI 2.77
$MAPS 2.66
$TCNNF 2.56
$VYGVF 2.17
$FROG 2.13
$ZIP 2.12
$DT 2.10
$JAMF 2.09
$ADSK 1.96
$OLO 1.84
$COTY 1.83
$MDB 1.79
$BBLN 1.74
$SMRT 1.53
$SEMR 1.36
$TVAC 1.18
$ENNV 1.18
$FMAC 1.18
$OCA 1.17

Upvote and Repost if you want to share!
How many positions do you have any what is your process for tracking them? Do you pay closer attention to larger weighted names?
View 4 more comments
"The Market" Stock Pitching Game Recap
Thanks everyone for coming to "The Market" game last night! We had 27 people show up and heard 7 separate stock pitches.

The pitchers were so good, I had a hard time cutting them off when their time was up. I promise to be more ruthless in the future, but man, it was really fun to see all the deep thought on display.

If you'd like to receive a calendar invite for next month's game, shoot me a DM with your email and join the group channel here: https://share.commonstock.com/share?invite=FIkFbJ

Here is a recap of the picks, links to the video, and the Commonstock users who pitched them:

Round 1:

Green Thumb Industries $GTBIF (OTCMKTS)
Adam Grossman @grossmanadam
Watch the pitch on Youtube HERE

Constellation Brands $STZ
Kyla Scanlon @kyla => Most votes
Watch the pitch on Youtube HERE
Read Kyla's memo on Constellation Brands HERE

Kulicke and Soffa $KLIC
Chris Seifel @chasinggreatness
Wath the pitch on Youtube HERE
Sign up for Chris' premium newsletter HERE

Round 2:

Voyager Digital $VYGVF
Marcus Eagan @marcussorealheis => Most votes
Watch the pitch on Youtube HERE

Argo Blockchain $ARBKF
Gannon Breslin @gannon
Watch the pitch on Youtube HERE

Peloton $PTON
Pat Connolly @pat_connolly
Watch the pitch on Youtube HERE

Activision Blizzard $ATVI
Jay Schlesinger @jays
Watch the pitch on Youtube HERE

See you all next month!
post media
Joined My Voyage(r) a week Ago? Up 30+%! Why there’s still time...
I don’t have time to explain what a short squeeze is here. They are rare and super uncommon. $VYGVF

Three things need to happen for them to work in my opinion:
‌‌
  1. Large amount of insiders holding a disproportionately large amount of the float. - in the case of Voyager, CHECK
‌‌
  1. An unreasonably high volume of shares sold short. Some finance academics say anything over 10% is actually bullish. I say anything over 45% is fish in a barrel. In the case of Voyager, the reported shares short was in the ~70% neighborhood, not mention the unreported OTC puts. The float short probably well exceeds 70, even though some people are trying to get out. In the case of Voyager - CHECK
‌‌
  1. The underlying fundamentals of a company are very strong, suggesting that anyone buying into the company is looking for long-term gains. Paper hands can kill a short squeeze, even on wall street. While the days to cover ratio means many shorters will be able to rally to cover, if retailers stop selling the damn shares the short sellers are toast. VYGVF is a crypto exchange. It’s so obvious. Don’t be ridiculous. Even if crypto tanks some, Voyager still makes money because paper hands will trade.

If the squeeze gets really bad, Voyager can quickly shoot up to $150-200, a price I believe it could reach three months after the Coinbase IPO. In other words, it would never come down, just hang in profits.

I am buying more.
Next
Commonstock is a social network that amplifies the knowledge of the best investors, verified by actual track records for signal over noise. Community members can link their existing brokerage accounts and share their real time portfolio, performance and trades (by percent only, dollar amounts never shared). Commonstock is not a brokerage, but a social layer on top of existing brokerages helping to create more engaged and informed investors.