Trending Assets
Top investors this month
Trending Assets
Top investors this month
@snippetfinance
Snippet Finance
$13.5M follower assets
Snippet Finance is a curation of the most interesting snippets on stocks, investing and finance delivered in a short easy to digest form. To inform and inspire.
14 following631 followers
Charting
  • Many fundamental investors don’t believe stock charts hold any value.
  • Yet technical analysis does have useful signals even for bottom up investors.
  • This was a pretty good basic introduction to charting – especially understanding the dynamics of participants and the so called “tug of war”.
  • Anyone else have any good solid charting resources - especially from perspective of helping fundamental investors (i.e. not traders).
tradingengineered.substack.com
How To Read a Stock Chart For Beginners
As Traders, Technical Analysis allows us to Judge Potential, Identify Accumulation, and Manage Risk. It allows us to see through the noise and interpret price action. Before we get into it make sure you are subscribed so you don’t miss any future posts!

Barry Diller Podcast
Diller is a legend.

Did you know he started working in the mailroom? He spent his time there reading all he could about the entertainment business.

📚 This is Barry Diller the Infinite Learner - as told in the first part of Reid Hoffman's excellent podcast interview.

But it is Diller's ability to unlearn, the title of the second part of the podcast, that is perhaps his greatest secret weapon.

He has an almost uncanny ability to change and adapt to a fluctuating world, something that has helped him stay on top for so many years.

Both podcasts are almost mandatory listening for anyone trying to understand the characteristics that add up to outstanding success.


🧐 Should you buy the latest ETF launch?
Ben-David et al. (2021) tried to answer this question by looking at how the model portfolios on which ETFs are built fare five years after launch when compared to three years before?

The results aren’t pretty.

Thematic strategies that added 3-5% a year pre-launch, lost 4-5% a year in the five years after. This is measured against benchmarks selected by the managers themselves.

It seems that hype in various areas, leads to a launch of ETFs which then don’t add any alpha.

So be careful when you invest in the next hot thing via ETF.

Note this is just the model portfolio performance (e.g. index) and NOT the ETF itself (though it should track very closely after costs).
post media
papers.ssrn.com
Competition for Attention in the ETF Space
The interplay between investors’ demand and providers’ incentives has shaped the evolution of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). While early ETFs invested in broad-b

I am surprised that the sector/Industry ETFs decline so much after launch. My initial thought is that these ETFs might have historically launched at the top of cycles. What do you think?
+ 2 comments
2022 ...
  • This year really does stand out …
  • Source: Excellent Blackrock slide deck.
post media
Snippet Finance
Equity and Bond Performance | Snippet Finance
2022 really does stand out ... Source: Blackrock.

How about that! One of those years so far..Personally I'm pleased with how relatively unaffected I am emotionally given the carnage my portfolio has seen haha. Just keep sitting on my hands and telling myself as a younger investor that it's better now than in 15 years! :)
Add a comment…
Hedge Funds Changing Stripes
  • If taking a minority public stake and pushing an activist agenda doesn’t work?
  • … why not just take the company private.
  • This is the transition that has been going on at Elliott, the famous hedge fund, over the past several years.
  • Apart from Citrix and Athenahealth (the recent sale made them $5bn of profit) they have done a bunch of other deals (see table).
  • Interestingly, this is all being done out of one fund. The lines between private and public markets continue to blur.
post media
Forbes
Wall Street’s Most Feared Activist Investor Is Changing His Game After Shaking Up Twitter, AT&T And Samsung
With a $17 billion exit and a $16.5 billion takeover already this year, the firm is showing off its ambitions in a different kind of investing.

Equities and Bond Yields
  • Equities struggle generally when yields are rising AND forward earnings per share (EPS) expectations are falling.
  • The latter is probably starting to happen now.
  • Great chart from Oxford Economics.
post media

Bonds are starting to become an attractive investment compared to stocks. As long as interest rates grow, investors will want to buy more bonds because they can get higher safe returns. That's my explanation for why equities struggle amid higher bond yields.
+ 1 comment
Biotech Bearish Fundamentals
  • Fundamentals have been bad in biotech land, something that is reflecting in share prices and IPO performance ($XBI has halved since peak).
  • Positive news flow among small and mid-cap biotechs, which hit 60% in 2020, has just fallen below 30%.
  • “But it’s not just small caps, it’s across the sector: Jefferies’ Michael Yee said of 45 major clinical readouts from large and small players, only 20% were positive.”
  • Clinical holds have also spiked – 2022 is off to a bad start (13 holds in 8 weeks) and could surpass the already bad 2021 (>50 vs. 30 average historically.
  • The full article offers some explanations of what is going on.
post media
LifeSciVC
Biotech Bears: Jumping A Lower Bar Or A Higher One? - LifeSciVC
Biotech sentiment is super bearish today, as the sector has been crushed over the last year. There’s blood in the water, especially for small and mid-cap players, and everyone’s looking for what caused the carnage. There are many factors at

10 1/2 Lessons from Experience by Paul Marshall
Marshall Wace was founded 25 years ago by Ian Wace and Paul Marshall. The firm runs both systematic and fundamental strategies and manages over $55bn. It is famous for running the TOPS alpha capture system which polls investment ideas from the sell-side.


This little book brilliantly boils down nearly 35 years of investing and, even more importantly, business experience.

Although it is absolutely worth reading in full (and takes no time), I thought a nice summary would help highlight these fantastic insights.

Lesson 1: Real markets are inefficient. There is a great disconnect between how academics (from Walras to Fama) view financial markets, as largely efficient, and their true nature, characterised by fat tails (as described by Mandelbrot) and reflexivity (Soros’ idea that prices influence fundamentals).

Lesson 2: People are deeply fallible. “Their perspective is bound to be either biased or inconsistent or both”. This is to say people are prone to behavioural biases like being too optimistic, viewing abnormal events as reverting to historic patterns, being overconfident, anchoring to initial information, and seeing all new evidence as confirmation of beliefs.

When combined together, these biases lead to a fragile system as described by the Minsky cycle. Periods of stability sow the seeds for future bouts of instability. This is a recognisable and predictable pattern of human behaviour and exploited for example by Marathon’s capital cycle investing philosophy.

Lesson 3: Investment skill is measurable and persistent.We have found that the most important ratio for digging below the surface is the success ratio – the percentage of winning trades – the Americans call it the ‘batting average’”. A truly great manager will have a success ratio of 55% i.e. you can be wrong 45% of the time.

Is there a feature common among these great managers?Perhaps above all they have to be resilient.” All managers have bad periods and no manager (apart from Druckenmiller) has not had at least one bad year. Interestingly, they find that the reddest flag of underperformance in TOPS are problems at home.

Lesson 4: In the short term the market is a voting machine, in the long term it is a weighing machine. The voting side is best understood by Keynes who said – “successful investing is anticipating the anticipation of others”. The weighing machine side is the domain of fundamental analysis. This demarcation is the reason Marshall Wace runs both systematic and fundamental strategies.

Lesson 5: The greatest opportunities always occur around change”. This is embodied in the idea of “valuation with a catalyst”. Valuation is a story and catalysts make that story complete. Markets love stories. Quality investing is the opposite of this form of investing.

These approaches are not mutually exclusive – “the best that can be said today is that the market is not good at predicting competitive advantage periods and frequently errs in both underestimating and overestimating the speed of change”. One way to take advantage of this is to scrutinise industry structures and sector level dynamics – because “not enough investors do it”.

Lesson 6: Concentration and Diversification. Concentration requires a high win/loss ratio, no position can be sleeping. Diversification’s advantages are mathematically proven. It is hard to reconcile these at an individual portfolio level but at the business/client level one can hold a diversified portfolio of concentrated portfolios.

Lesson 7: Shorts are different to longs. Alpha is easier to generate on the long side. Shorts are hard because they cost money to hold, involve competition in the borrowing market against other hedge funds, depend widely on regime (bull markets last 7 years, bear markets 1.5), and in theory have unlimited losses.

Shorts also see a rapidly falling Sharpe ratio as they go in your favour (financial leverage increases and they get more crowded) but increasing position size if they go against you. Good shorts are often a combination of weak or deteriorating growth, poor industry structure, regulatory pressure, dodgy accounting, and weak and deteriorating balance sheets.

Lesson 8: Machines are getting better and better especially as the amount of data balloons. Marshall Wace process 7.5 petabytes of data per day, which they expect to rise to 20 in three years. But machines aren’t good in crisis nor paradigm shifts nor at picking sectors. So there will always be room for humans but they need to adapt to use machines along side them.

Lesson 9: Risk management is key – you need to hold a prudential margin to protect against the “unknown unknowns”. How? (1) Use leverage but limit it (Marshall Wace runs a max gross of 400%, vs 700-800% for peers) and (2) Watch liquidity (they never own more than 5% of any stock). “Never be in a position where a stock owns you”.

Lesson 10: Size matters. Though one needs $350m to breakeven in a hedge fund these days, the temptation to get very big is high. Size leads to non-linearly scaling trading costs and huge liquidity footprints. They found that most good managers can deliver strong alpha up to $1bn of capital, very few can do so persistently above $3bn.

Lesson 10 1/2: Most fund management careers end in failure. This relates mainly to character. On the one hand there is dealing with downside – it is very hard to be wrong even 45% of the time. Decision making freezes up.

On the other is hubris. Ancient Rome had a good approach to hubris. A winning general would be given a huge parade on his return. At the end of it the general would ride in a chariot to the centre of Rome. In his chariot he would be accompanied by an ‘Auriga’ (a slave with gladiator status) who would whisper in the general’s ear – “memento Mori”, remember you are mortal.
neckar.substack.com
Stanley Druckenmiller, Part 1: The Young Gun Finds His Game
“I’ve always loved to play games, and face it, investing is one big game. You need to be decisive, open-minded, flexible and competitive.”

Wow, snippet this is probably one of my favourite memos of yours of all time. I am now adding 10 1/2 lessons from Experience, Perspectives on Fund Management to my reading list.

I enjoy books on investing that don't view concepts in a vacuum but rather view it in the context of human psychology. From the lessons you've listed, it appears that this is exactly the approach that the book takes.

An interesting fact about the Roman approach to combating Hubris btw :)
+ 5 comments
Inflation = Changing Consumption Patterns
  • Whether it will be transitory (whatever that means) or more sticky - the current shock to the price level is already having an impact on consumption patterns according to Nielsen IQ.
  • Source: DailyShot and Trahan Macro
post media

@erics03/31/2022
That's a really interesting visualization - thanks for posting it
+ 1 comment
Watchlist
Something went wrong while loading your statistics.
Please try again later.
Already have an account?