I support this, especially if it's used to buy back stock. I frankly don't understand their hesitancy to be more aggressive here. But, as with their ill timed buybacks last year, it just feels like they're playing catch up and being reactive - idk what's wrong with Dave but he probably deserves the most blame here. How do you buy back $40 bil right before stock tanks, then proceed to issue bonds a couple points higher than you would have gotten this time last year?