Andy Buchanan's avatar
$21.4m follower assets
No chips, no crypto, no semiconductors, no chips. Exposure to semiconductors is diversified (safer) exposure to crypto. Change my mind.

(Or agree with me, but please do it fiercely 😄)
Yegor's avatar
I’ll have to agree, makes sense to me
Andy Buchanan's avatar
@from100kto1m points because this rhymes 😄
delos's avatar
semiconductors are almost literally the picks and shovels of crypto. but when lambo 🦍?
Michael Panebianco's avatar
This might be the case at the moment but with the rise of proof-of stake currently used by $ADA.X and many other smaller coins, with $ETH.X set to follow suit, ASICs will become redundant.

Exposure to semiconductors may indirectly give you exposure to crypto but I would expect it's practically negligible when you consider all of the things in the world that use semiconductors.

Author

Related

Already have an account?