SLT Core Portfolio: Copart ($CPRT) - From Junk to Gold
Copart is another idea sourced using our internally developed Quality-Growth stock screener. We found it very interesting and challenging to analyze due to our unfamiliarity with CPRT and the salvage vehicle auction market in general. We hope you will enjoy this write-up and as always, please let us know what you think!
Thesis
  • CPRT disrupted the salvage auto auction industry and transforms junk into gold. Driven by its technological competitive advantage, the company is a leader in its industry. Moats are multiple and we believe the company will be able to sustain its leading position thanks to high barriers to entry and its network effect.
  • The salvage auto auction market is set to continue its above-average growth fueled by higher total vehicle miles travelled, older fleet and hence higher salvage rates.
  • We are attracted by CPRT's long history of revenue growth, high profitability and very healthy balance sheet.
  • CPRT kept its entrepreneurial spirit established by its founder Willis Johnson and perpetrated by its son-in-law, now CEO for more than 12 years. Management scored an impressive 17/20 using our management assessment checklist. Over the years the company has been able to consistently compound shareholder wealth at superior rates of return.
  • CPRT valuation is attractive. Share are trading well below historical average multiples and at a lower premium vs. peers.
Company Description
Copart was co-founded in 1982 by Willis Johnson and is one of the leading provider of online auctions and vehicle remarketing services. It takes those vehicles and auctions them primarily for insurers (80% of the salvaged vehicle supply). Buyers are mostly rebuilders, licensed dismantlers, and used-car dealers and exporters. The company has replaced live auctions with internet auctions using a platform known as Virtual Bidding Third Generation (VB3 for short). It also provides services such as towing and storage to buyers and other salvage
companies. Copart serves customers throughout North America, Europe, the Middle
East, and Brazil, although the US accounts for about 85% of sales.
Before we jump into how CPRT is actually making money, we would like to detail the “salvage equation” which is key and which will follow us throughout this analysis.
When a car is in an accident, it is usually assessed by an agent appointed by the policy holder's insurance company. The adjuster estimates the repair costs. Given the amount of the repair costs, the insurance company faces two choices:
  1. If the pre-accident vehicle value (PAV) minus repair and supplemental costs is greater than salvage value, the vehicle is repaired.
  2. If PAV minus repair costs is less than salvage value, the vehicle is totaled and sold through auction.
It's when the second scenario occurs that CPRT comes into action. When an insurance company decides to declare a total loss on a vehicle and to sell it via an auction, CPRT arranges for the transportation of a vehicle to its nearest facility (salvage yard). The salvage vehicle then remains between 45-60 days on the salvage yard, period during which ownership documents are transferred and the vehicle is declared as salvage. The vehicle can then be sold at auction on VB3, typically within seven days. In order to participate to an auction, a buyer must be a member. Currently, three memberships are available: Guest (free, members are only available to see the inventory and set-up alerts when specific vehicles are added), Basic ($59 p.a.), Premier ($199 p.a.). The last two differ on the number and amount of transactions allowed. When a transaction is agreed, proceeds are then collected from the member, typically seller fees are subtracted, and the remainder is remitted to the seller.
At a glance, CPRT operates and own more than 200 salvage yards in 11 countries, which allow
them to list more than 265k vehicles online every day and sell more than 3mn vehicles per year. CPRT has buyers in more than 190 countries.
Competitive Moat
Technology: CPRT is a disruptor by nature. Long before the pandemic forced other businesses
to adopt virtual work practices, the company established an exclusively digital auction marketplace in 2003, creating an environment in which sellers and buyers from around the world can transact on a reliable, trustworthy platform. VB3 has been classified as the best auto online auctions platform by a lot of experts.
image
Source: Investors Presentation
Network Effect: CPRT also enjoys a strong network effect, which is a powerful competitive advantage we love to see at SLT Research. The network effect is a phenomenon whereby increased numbers of people or participants improve the value of a good or service. Thanks to CPRT developed network of insurers and salvage yards, it offers diverse supply which attracts more members. As more buyers bid on the platform, vehicles are sold quicker, at a higher price, which attracts more insurer to sell through CPRT and the flywheel goes on and on. Some of the leading, fastest-growing companies have achieved success because of
network effects.
Barriers to entry:
  • Scale: it takes time before reaching the necessary scale to be able to match thousands of sellers and buyers. CPRT spent 40+ years developing relationships with major insurance carriers.
  • Land: salvage yards are not easy to acquire as multiple requirements are necessary. No one is able to match the CPRT's 200+ permitted yards network.
  • Process complexity: managing catastrophes, providing detailed reporting to sellers, deploying sub-haul network of 4,000 providers, navigating regulatory and title processing across 50 states and multiple countries. The sale of salvage vehicles requires more expertise than used cars.
Sustainable Growth
One of the long-term growth drivers is international development. The company, despite having international buyers, is mainly centered around North America. Continued expansion in Europe and new markets in Asia could unlock massive opportunities.
We will focus here on the “macro trends” that are driving CPRT demand, independently of the location.
image
Source: CPRT investors presentation, April 2016 – please note that some trends might not be relevant anymore.
The equation is relatively simple, more miles driven imply more accidents given stable or even increasing accident rate per mile. Above this, aging fleet (lower pre-accident vehicle value) with higher costs to repair due to increased complexity (materials used, technology…), and coupled with higher salvage rates, result in more vehicles declared as total loss after an accident. It is important to note here that the transition toward EV has a little impact on CPRT as EV are still susceptible to be involved in a accident, and instead might inflate repair costs.
Total vehicle miles travelled: The below graph shows that miles travelled significantly increased over the years, with a logical decline during the pandemic. However, according to FRED data, we are back to pre-pandemic level and this trend is expected to remain upward slopping, fueled by emerging countries and overall increasing population.
image
Accident rate per million miles:
image
Source: FRED, NHTSA, SLT Research
Improved safety in new cars helped to enhance safety during the period covered by the above bar chart. However, we can see that starting roughly ten years ago, the downward trend reversed. Accidents occur more often nowadays, mainly due to increased distraction brought by the use of devices (e.g. smartphone) while driving as exhibited in the below graph.
image
Salvage Rates: Salvage rates tend to be higher for older vehicles as the pre-accident value decline with the years. The average age of light vehicles in operation in the US rose to 12.2 years in 2022.
image
We can observe in the below chart that the percentage of claims flagged as total loss is more important for old vehicles, hence there should be more potential vehicles being sold by CPRT.
image
Financials
Before delving into the numbers themselves and when looking at the evolution trends below, we can see that all ratios moved in the right direction over the last 6 years (except ROE but this will be discussed later).
image
Revenue grew from $1.3bn in 2016 to $3.5bn in 2022 (FY ended 7/31), representing an 18.44%
CAGR over the last 6 years. 85% of the revenue is classified as service revenues (membership subscriptions and transactions fees) while only 15% come from vehicles sales by CPRT.
Gross and operating profit margins both improved, the latter increased by almost 10% over the period under review, while the former rose by c.3%. Margins improvement has been driven by a reduction in yard operations expenses. It represented 37% of revenue in 2021, declining constantly over the period, which implies that, with scale, CPRT became more efficient at operating its salvage yards. SG&A was the other area of improvement as they have been cut to 4.5% of revenue (from 7.1% in 2016). What is really important to highlight here is that CPRT does not spend a dollar on selling and marketing expenses. The company has been attracting buyers only thanks to its network effect and the superior quality of its VB3 product. This customer acquisition cost of $0 allows the company to hire more than 700 IT engineers working on the platform while keeping margin levels relatively high.
ROE decreased over the period, however it is important to put things in context and nothing
is better than a DuPont analysis to demonstrate why it is actually a positive sign. ROE declined by c.4% over the period despite a net profit margin jump of 10%. One could assume that, all else being constant, the ROE should have increased by the same amount. However, and even if asset turnover remained stable, leverage significantly decreased. We can see now that ROE is mainly driven by the net profit margin rather leverage, which we are more comfortable with.
image
CPRT's balance sheet is very strong. From a liquidity point of view, current assets represent 5x current liabilities. As of FY2022, the company was sitting on c.$1.4 billion of cash & cash equivalents. The cash ratio has been multiplied by 5.6x (vs. 2.8x for the current ratio). This is explained by both accounts receivable and inventory representing a lower portion of the current assets, and cash significantly increasing as % of current assets.
From a solvability perspective, CPRT level of debt is low. Total debt in 2022 represented less than 3% of total equity and total assets respectively. Management has been focused on reducing CPRT gearing over the last years, as demonstrated by the total debt to equity ratio dropping from 82.7% in 2016 to 2.58% in 2022. Last reported EBIT was at a level able to cover more than 74x the company’s interest expense. The Altman’s Z-Score around 30 supports even more CPRT’s very healthy financial condition.
The company generated a free cash flow (FCF) of $839.2mn in 2022. The latter fluctuated in line with Net Income. From an investing point of view, the main use of cash was the acquisition of fixed prod assets. Regarding financing, and as already mentioned, CPRT management has been mainly repaying long term debt as well as repurchasing stocks.
  1. Quick comparison with main competitors
image
CPRT largest competitor is IAA. They evenly share 80% of the total market for years however,
CPRT has been gaining share in recent year. As exhibited in the above table, CPRT upgrades all its competitors by far with the higher profitability of the group and by doing so with very low leverage. CPRT is the only company of the group with a negative net debt. In comparison, IAA debt represents more than 75% of its total assets and net debt equals 4.9x equity, which explains why IAA ROE is misleading in the above table.
Management and ESG considerations
image
CPRT has the highest management score we assessed so far. Willis Johnson founded the company out of a single lot in Vallejo, CA in 1982 after several years operating a dismantling yard near Sacramento. He took the company public in 1994. Johnson stepped down as CEO in 2010 and handed over the reins to his son-in-law, Jay Adair, who first joined CPRT in 1989 at age 19. There is no doubt that Adair knows the company inside out and learned a lot from his father-in-low and we’d guess mentor. They created CPRT unique corporate culture, and made it one of its core strength. CPRT's mission is to create value and opportunity through vehicle auctions and exchange.
As already mentioned, the management has been focused on buying back shares opportunistically and/or reducing drastically CPRT's leverage which both benefited shareholders. CPRT is a true compounder, where earnings are reinvested in the business for 40 years now and we expect this trend to continue as long as management finds positive NPV projects. The retention rate is 1 and we would like it to remain so because we believe that the future of CPRT is international. We believe there is more shareholder value to unlock if CPRT pursues its bold international development rather than returning cash to investors.
On the ESG front and from its inception, CPRT plays a critical role in the automotive circular economy as the key intermediary enabling the recycling and reuse of automobiles and automotive parts. Across the globe, approximately half of the employees are women, and 52%
are non-Caucasian. Furthermore, the management team is 35% women and 33% people
of color.
Valuation
image
As of September, 14th 2022
Shares of CPRT trade at an important discount to the 5Y historical average multiples, especially with regards to P/BV (37% discount, biggest ever experienced in the last 5Y). All
the above multiples are below or around -1 standard deviation from their 5Y historical average.
Historically the company has always been valued at a premium compared to competitors, and for obvious reasons, as explained at the end of the financials section (comparison vs. peers). If we use the P/E ratio for example, the current premium is only 26% vs. a 5Y average of 57% representing a standard deviation of -1.8. We believe that, based on both absolute and relative valuation basis, the current share price offers a nice opportunity to buy CPRT stocks.
Risks
  • Self-driving cars: they do not drive drunk or exhausted and are not distracted by a notification popping-up on their smartphone about the new CPI print while driving. It is easy to assume that these cars will reduce accident rate per million miles travelled however, there’s still a lot of innovation to be done before driverless cars can become affordable, widely adopted products at a global scale.
  • Global and greener re-urbanization may impact global use of cars.
  • International development might cause margin contraction in the short-term.
Nathan Worden's avatar
This is a lot of fun to learn about. I hadn't heard of Copart, and I'd imagine if you're not a rebuilder, licensed dismantlers, or used-car dealer, most people probably haven't heard of it either.

I didn't realize salvage vehicle auction market was so big. Copart is a $26B company 🤓


Image upload
SLT Research's avatar
@nathanworden I hadn't heard of Copart either - so no biases, just trying to understand the salvage market and the company which was very interesting.

I think I should mention the market cap going forward. Copart closest competitor IAA is much smaller though.

Image upload
Nathan Worden's avatar
I am impressed that they were able to buy 200 salvage yards in 11 countries in the 30 years they've been in business. That's like 6.6 salvage yards per year.
SLT Research's avatar
@nathanworden I agree, very impressive. In 2021 for example they added 12 new locations, including 10 in the US.

Image upload
Conor's avatar
Outstanding analysis! Chris Mayer who wrote "100 Baggers" (a great book), is an investor in $CPRT so you know you're in great company here.

I can't help but think of one of my favorite childhood movies when reading about this company, The Brave Little Toaster. I really hope their salvage yards aren't anything like in the movie.


Image upload

Why on earth is Copart so much superior to its competitors? Their closest competitor can't hold water to them. This is obviously a good thing, but I want to understand why that is. Is it because of their relationships with the insurance companies? Is it the fact that they have permits for over 200 salvage yards? Maybe a combination?

I'm not worried about self-driving cars anytime soon. That is a long, long way off, and self-driving cars are arguably in more accidents because people get complacent when using them. Some very scary news articles out there with people crashing Teslas while using self-drive.

I totaled my car, and it was completely smashed, and it ended up going to the salvage yard. I never thought about what happened there, but I guess it was probably in an auction. The insurance company cut me a nice check, and I was on my way. Is there any risk from an insurance point of view of being more stringent on what counts as "totaled"?

One metric, I pay very close attention to is the gross profit margin. In 2021 Copart's gross profit margin was 49.9% higher than their 10-year average of 43.3%. Everything I look for in a stock is in Copart.

My only worry is the lack of optionality. It seems to be a pretty single-dimensional line of revenue for Copart. Is there a way they would be able to recycle batteries from EVs and get a cut for that market? That seems to be a huge market in the next 20 years.

Nathan Worden's avatar
@conorvalue I’m also not worried about self driving cars anytime soon^
SLT Research's avatar
@conorvalue Thanks Conor, really appreciate it.

It would require further analysis but the first thing would be that IAA mostly leases their yards while CPRT acquires them as much as possible, and is able to finance them with the CF they generate. They also have a leaner cost structure. I would not say it is because of the 200 yards because IAA is operating as many sites (give or take). But CPRT technology and relations with salvage vehicle suppliers is the key differentiator in my opinion.

Regarding the risk from an insurance point of view, it is a very good question and I believe the risk here is if both average vehicles age and repair costs decline, because insurer would most likely repair the car than "totaling" it. But for me, they do not have control over these factors.

CPRT does not communicate much on the very long term strategy. As it stands, I'd say that dismantlers would buy EV on CPRT platform and then sell the battery to a recycling company.
But I agree that given the ever increasing number of electronic components in a car and the rise of EV, it could be interesting to see them exploring these options.
Joshua Simka's avatar
Copart founder and chairman Wills J. Johnson is probably one of the most unassuming billionaires in the U.S.

A lot of my lessons were learned from when I was a kid, being raised with my father as an independent entrepreneur that couldn't read, but he could start a business in a whim. Everything my dad said, you know, I just lived on it. I just thrived on everything he did, and I just wanted to learn, learn, learn. I didn't realize that I was teaching myself the importance of running a business.

I love this little clip of him... https://youtu.be/4UHvz-_zY0E

Image upload
SLT Research's avatar
@tomato thanks for sharing. Analyzing CPRT really made me want to read his book

Author

Related